Negation and Pronoun Position as a way of investigating verb movement and the emergence of do support during Early Modern English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36602/faj/2021.n18.01Keywords:
verb raising, do support, negative interrogatives, , Early Modern EnglishAbstract
This paper presents an analysis of the rise of do support and the gradual loss of verb movement during the period of Early Modern English. The analysis focuses on studying the structures in which do support was first used as an alternative to verb raising to I. It takes into consideration the analysis of the relationship between the position of the negation marker not in negative interrogative structures and the position of the subject and the object pronouns in these structures. The analysed structures are negative interrogatives taken from Shakespeare’s works in the period of Early Modern English. The results of the data analysis show that in most cases, there is do support when the subject pronouns are above negation, while there is no do support when object pronouns appear above negation. This suggests that do was first inserted here to avoid object raising with the verb to I or to C to avoid putting object and subject pronouns in subsequent positions.
References
Aitchison, J. (2001). Language Change: Progress or Decay?, (3rd ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809866
Ellegard, V. (1953). The Auxiliary Do: Establishment and Regulations of its Use in English. Gothenburg Studies in English. Volume 2.
Goodhue, D. (2019). High Negation Questions and Epistemic Bias in Espinal, M.T et al (eds) proceedings of Sin und Bedeutung 23, vol I: 469-485.
Han, C & A. Kroch. (2000). The Rise of do-Support in English: implications for clause structure. Proceedings of the 30th meeting of the North East Linguistics. 311-325.
Hsieh, H and S, Shannon (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15 (9),1277-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Lightfoot, David, (1993), ‘Why UG needs a learning theory: triggering verb movement’ in Jones Charles, Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, Harlow: Longman, pp, 190-214.
Macleod, M. (2020). Postverbal Negation and the Lexical Split of not. English Language and Linguistics, 24 (4): 667-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000170
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 عائشة فتحي أبوغرسة
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, and redistribution for any purpose, including commercial ones, provided that proper credit is given to the original author and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
