The Jurisprudential Rule: "No Consideration for Suspicion that is Clearly Erroneous

Authors

  • Mostafa Ali Al-Juhani Faculty of Education – University Tripoli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36602/faj.2018.n11.02

Keywords:

Conjecture, Certainty, Legal maxims, Fiqh principle, Ẓann in the Qur'an

Abstract

This study addresses a significant legal maxim in Islamic jurisprudence: that conjecture (ẓann) is disregarded when contradicted by certainty or proven incorrect. The principle is well-established through authentic Sharia evidence and is a subset of the broader maxim: "Certainty is not overruled by doubt." Key findings of the study include: ẓann is defined as a likely assumption with the possibility of being false; it varies in strength—some forms are obligatory to follow, others prohibited, and some permissible. The Qur'an uses the term ẓann in three senses: certainty, accusation, and assumption. Related terms include doubt, illusion, and certainty. Most scholars who wrote on legal maxims emphasized the importance of this rule, despite differing expressions, and it applies to various branches of Islamic jurisprudence. These insights highlight the enduring relevance and depth of the principle in the framework of Islamic law.

Published

01-06-2018

How to Cite

Al-Juhani, M. A. (2018). The Jurisprudential Rule: "No Consideration for Suspicion that is Clearly Erroneous. (Faculty of Arts Journal) مجلة كلية الآداب - جامعة مصراتة, (11), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.36602/faj.2018.n11.02

Issue

Section

Language and Literary Studies

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.