Editorial Policy

This policy outlines the principles and procedures that govern the editorial and publication process at the Faculty of Arts Journal, ensuring the academic quality of published content, editorial transparency, and adherence to ethical and scholarly standards.

1. Scope and General Editorial Process

  • All submitted materials are subject to an initial assessment by the Editorial Board to determine their relevance to the journal’s aims, academic scope, and submission requirements.
  • The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject or request revisions to any submission that does not meet the journal’s quality standards.

2. Role of the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board

  • The Editor-in-Chief holds final responsibility for the acceptance of submissions for publication.
  • The Editorial Board works in collaboration with peer reviewers to ensure a fair and double-blind peer review process, in line with the journal's Peer Review Policy.
  • The Editorial Board is committed to impartiality and objectivity, with no discrimination based on institutional affiliation, gender, nationality, or other factors.

3. Submission Acceptance Criteria

4. Revisions and Improvements

  • Authors may be requested to revise their submissions based on reviewer or editorial feedback prior to final acceptance.
  • In case of rejection, authors will be informed of the objective reasons for the decision.

5. Handling Complaints and Violations

6. Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

  • The journal adheres to its AI Usage Policy, which defines acceptable and prohibited uses of AI tools in academic research:
    • AI use is permitted without disclosure for tasks such as language editing or summary generation.
    • AI use is accepted with disclosure for tasks such as drafting the theoretical framework or literature review.
    • AI use is strictly prohibited for generating or interpreting research results.

For legal and ethical reference, please consult the journal’s General Publication Policies.