A Cognitive Constraints on Sentence Processing
Evidence for an Interface between Working Memory and Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36602/faj.2026.n21.06Keywords:
Working memory, grammar, sentence processing, cognitive constraintsAbstract
Sentence processing refers to the ability to understand language, a complex cognitive activity that allows humans to produce an unlimited number of sentences. This ability is closely linked to working memory, a system with limited capacity that temporarily stores and processes information during comprehension. This study explores the relationship between working memory and grammar by reviewing key theoretical models related to working memory and sentence processing. Unlike previous research that has mainly relied on laboratory tasks and focused on native speakers, this study examines English as a Foreign Language (EFL) of 30 university students’ own experiences with understanding complex sentences. It followed a mixed method research design. Data were collected through a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The study results reveal that there are several factors affecting the comprehension of complex structure. For instance, comprehension, attention and contextual clues. The findings discuss in light of existing theories, highlighting how cognitive constraints influence sentence comprehension. Given its exploratory nature and sample size, the study provides preliminary insights intended to inform future large-scle research on cognitive constraints in L2 processing.
References
Alshehri, N. (2024). The Role of Working Memory Capacity in L2 Vocabulary Learning Among Saudi EFL Students. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics. DOI: 10.5296/jsel.v12i1.22242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v12i1.22242
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. https://pages.ucsd.edu/~scoulson/203/baddely.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359
Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), R136–R140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982209021332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014
Cowan, N. (1999). An Embedded-Processes Model of Working Memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory (pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press. https://memory.psych.missouri.edu/assets/doc/articles/1999/cowan-1999-miyake-book.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press. https://app.nova.edu/toolbox/instructionalproducts/edd8124/fall11/1974-Baddeley-and-Hitch.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar. Language, 82(4), 711–733. https://www.unm.edu/~jbybee/downloads/Bybee2006FromUsage.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press. http://www.its.caltech.edu/~matilde/ChomskyMinimalistProgram.pdf
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications. https://archive.org/details/lecturesongovern0000chom/mode/1up
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0616323.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323
Clark, H.H., & Clark, E, V. (1977) Psychology and language: An Introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/15733/6129.pdf
De Azevedo, B., Oliveira, D.A., Finger, I. et al. Working memory capacity as a predictor of text idea recall in multitasking L2 digital reading. Psicol. Refl. Crít. 38, 14 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-025-00353-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-025-00353-2
Durand‑López, M. (2024). Working memory Yields Improvement in L2 morphosyntactic processing. Journal of Second Language Studies, 12(3), 145–167.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. https://englelab.gatech.edu/articles/2002/current-directions-in-psychological-science-2002-engle-19-23.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160
Fodor, J. A., & Garrett, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(7), 289–296. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227336038_Some_syntactic_determinants_of_sentential_complexity DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211044
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. https://tedlab.mit.edu/tedlab_website/researchpapers/Gibson_1998_Cogn.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95–126). MIT Press. https://tedlab.mit.edu/tedlab_website/researchpapers/Gibson_2000_DLT.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008
Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Christiansen, M. H., & Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. (2019). Memory limitations are hidden in grammar. Cognitive Science, 43 (6), e12738. https://www.grupolys.org/biblioteca/GomChrFer2022a.pdf
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13(5), 425–430. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6684166_Age_Differences_In_Memory-Load_Interference_Effects_In_Syntactic_Processing DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00475
Gui, J. & Ismail, S.M. (2024). The effect of planning time on vocabulary acquisition in a task-based environment: the mediating roles of working memory and field (in)dependence. BMC Psychology, 12:145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01638-4
https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-024-01638-4
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. http://www.ccbi.cmu.edu/reprints/Just_Carpenter_PsychRev-1992_capacity-theory.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602. https://www.academia.edu/18214025/Individual_differences_in_syntactic_processing_The_role_of_working_memory
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 580–602. https://www.academia.edu/18214025/Individual_differences_in_syntactic_processing_The_role_of_working_memory DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90027-H
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Karlsson, F. (2014). Complexity in Linguistic theorizing. The mental Lexicon, 9(2), 144-169. https://doi.org/10.10.75/ml.9.2.01kar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.2.01kar
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. https://tallinzen.net/media/readings/lewis_vasishth_2005.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25
Liu K, Murao R. Reliability and Validity assessment of working memory measurements. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2025;46:e3. Doi:10.1017/S0142716425000049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716425000049
Logie, R.H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Lawence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315804743/visuo-spatial-working-memory-robert-logie
Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 419–491). Wiley. https://philpapers.org/rec/MILFMO
Miller, G. A., & McKean, K. O. (1964). A chronometric study of some relations between sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(4), 297–308. https://pages.ucsd.edu/~mckenzie/Wason1968QJEP.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216408416385
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiecy: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. (pp. 339–364). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276947375_Individual_differences_in_adult_second_language_learning_A_cognitive_perspective
Reichle, E. D. (2021). Models of sentence processing. Oxford Academic. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49694744_Models_of_the_Reading_Process DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195370669.003.0004
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2001). Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16 (1), 128–144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28762699_Verbal_Working_Memory_and_Sentence_Comprehension DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.16.1.128
Van der Meer, J. (2012). Students’ Note-Taking Challenges in the Twenty-First Century: Considerations for Teachers and Academic Staff Developers. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 13-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590974
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ابتسام فتحي اقنيجيوة
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published from January 2025 onward are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, and redistribution for any purpose, including commercial ones, provided that proper credit is given to the original author and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
